Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
The London night skyline. Sharing such pictures could mean violating the copyright of each building's architect, under the law, and 'the UK creative industry would be encumbered with interminable bureaucracy'.
‘Freedom of panorama is the unrestricted right to use photographs of public spaces, without infringing the rights of the architect or the visual artist.’ Photograph: Loop Images Ltd/Alamy
‘Freedom of panorama is the unrestricted right to use photographs of public spaces, without infringing the rights of the architect or the visual artist.’ Photograph: Loop Images Ltd/Alamy

If you want to keep sharing photos for free, read this

This article is more than 8 years old
Jimmy Wales
The Wikipedia co-founder warns that freedom of panorama – the right to use photos of public spaces without restriction – is under threat. Sign up to save it

If you have ever travelled to Paris, you probably visited and took pictures of the Eiffel Tower. There is a special delight in capturing it with your own camera, commemorating the moment of standing next to this marvel yourself.

But if you happened to take those pictures at night, you may be surprised to know that according to French law, your rights to use them are limited. The illumination of the Eiffel Tower is considered to be a separate artistic installation. Because France does not have full freedom of panorama; copyright restrictions make it illegal to publish these pictures without proper authorisation.

Freedom of panorama is the unrestricted right to use photographs of public spaces, without infringing the rights of the architect or the visual artist. Wikipedia only uses freely licensed images. Therefore, this valuable exception to copyright is necessary in order to allow Wikipedia to freely depict public spaces on relevant articles. Most European Union countries enjoy full freedom of panorama. However, in some European countries, such as Belgium and France, this freedom is restricted.

The impressive Atomium in Brussels, for instance, is a beautiful structure, but pictures of it are restricted from being freely used. As a result, the Wikipedia article about the Atomium does not feature any photos of the original structure. You have to make do with an image of a model replica in Austria.

The European parliament is currently considering some copyright reforms. If adopted, freedom of panorama would be restricted throughout all EU states. According to a proposed amendment to a report which will be the basis of a recommendation to the legislative body, the European Commission, the right to freely use images of works permanently located in public spaces would always be subject to prior authorisation. Unless the legal affairs committee rejects the proposal, hundreds of thousands of images on Wikipedia would be subject to copyright restrictions and would face the risk of being removed.

‘if you happened to take pictures of the Eiffel Tower at night, according to French law, your rights to use them are limited.’ Photograph: Ludovic Marin/AFP/Getty Images

The “reform” would have terrible consequences for the way we share and create culture and knowledge. The UK creative industry, recognised as one of the most vibrant in the world, would be encumbered with interminable bureaucracy. Photojournalists would need to seek permission after permission instead of doing what they do best: taking fine photographs.

On 9 July a vote will take place in Strasbourg. Please write to your MEP and call them to vote against amendment 421 of the Implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC. Sign the petition to save the freedom of photography. Share this article on social media and ask your friends to do the same. Now is our time to fight for full freedom of panorama in Europe.

This article was amended on 8 July 2015. An earlier version said that the European parliament is currently engaged in the adoption of some copyright reforms, which, if accepted, would mean that the freedom of panorama would be restricted throughout all EU states. In addition it also said that “this is the last chance” to stop the proposal becoming law. This has been corrected.

Most viewed

Most viewed